Feed aggregator

Carbon emissions are slowly acidifying ocean waters, forcing marine life to adapt. Oysters and other shellfish, for example, may have a harder time building their shells, according to NOAA's Richard Feely. At Quilcene, Washington's Taylor Shellfish Hatchery, research director Benoit Eudeline says he's already seeing those effects.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Like any major city near a coast, Seattle likely won't be immune from rising sea levels and other effects of global warming. Mayor Mike McGinn discusses the city's plans for addressing climate change, including his push to divest Seattle's pension funds from fossil fuel investments, and the city council's plan to make Seattle carbon neutral by 2050.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Since his days as head of the Solar Energy Research Institute under President Jimmy Carter, Denis Hayes has been pushing to add more renewable energy sources to the country's energy portfolio. Hayes discusses the current U.S. market for renewables such as solar and wind, and gives his take on where he sees America's energy future headed.

» E-Mail This     » Add to Del.icio.us

Around 200 people occupied one of London's key financial districts as part of a range of anti-G8 protests

One of London's key financial districts saw its biggest ever protest on Friday as an estimated 200 people occupied Canary Wharf to protest against public spending cuts and lack of action against climate change.

Among the protesters were pensioners, children, people with disabilities, a brass band, musicians and a range of groups including Fuel Poverty Action, Disabled People Against Cuts, the Greater London Pensioners Association, No Dash for Gas and UK Uncut.

A spokeswoman for the event said: "We picked Canary Wharf because it's a symbol of out-of-control neoliberal capitalism. It's completely private property where protests have been outlawed. We've come here because we want to pull together anti-capitalist, climate and anti-austerity struggles."

The owner of Canary Wharf has previously taken legal action and put in place security measures to prevent protests in home of some of Britain's biggest banks. The action was part of a range of anti-G8 protests currently taking place, but unlike other events this one passed peacefully.

Protesters erected and scaled bamboo tripods – structures designed to prevent attempts to clear the area by force. An assembly, speeches and workshops were held, as well as creative activities, music and poetry performances and guerilla gardening.

James Granger, of Fuel Poverty Action, who helped organise the event, said the banks and financial institutions in Canary Wharf are "bankrolling fossil fuel projects across the world which are causing climate change and fuel poverty".

"The price of fossil fuels is increasing, which is leading to one-quarter of the UK population facing the choice between heating and eating," he said. "I'm here to say that there is an alternative – renewable energy which is cheaper and cleaner, and an economy that works for the needs of people not the needs of profit."

Betty Cottingham of the Greater London Pensioners Association said: "I'm here to protest along with the young and middle-aged people about what this lot are doing to our world. There's going to be 3,000 extra deaths this winter because pensioners and other people daren't turn the heating on."

A Canary Wharf banker, who did not wish to be named, said he did not make the link between banking and the recession. "If it hadn't been caused by banking it would have been caused but something else," he said. "I think these people are here because they care about what's going on out there and the recession has given them a justification to get out here and do this."

• Activism
• Protest
• Climate change
• London
• Banking
• Austerity
• Economics
• G8

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

My father, John Bowden, a hard-working, hard-living livestock farmer, who has died aged 101, always held the view that pulling together was better than ploughing a lone furrow.

He was proud to have been involved in setting up an agricultural co-operative in his local area. It had genuinely benefited its members over the years, he said. In winter 1962 a handful of farmers from the sheep- and cattle-breeding area of north Cumberland (as it was then) met in secret in the back room of the Conservative club at Haltwhistle, on the Cumbria-Northumberland border. They had heard that a southern-based trading company planned to set up a co-op in their area. In a pre-emptive strike, the northerners decided to start one of their own.

Calling itself West Tyne Farmers, the group combined members' buying power to cut prices on items such as livestock feed, fertiliser, fuel and seeds. John agreed to be the group's chairman, a post he held for its first 17 years. Since it began, West Tyne Farmers has steadily maintained a membership of about 30. It is admired as a successful example of a small buyers' co-op, unobtrusive yet effective.

John was born in Gateshead, then in County Durham. The Bowdens were city folk – mainly accountants. But at harvest in 1926, aged 14, John started work as a "farm laddie", an apprentice at Hardriding farm, near Hexham in Northumberland. He received no pay, just his keep. By 1935, he was considered reliable enough to be granted the tenancy of Wydon Eals, a 500-acre mixed farm in the picturesque South Tyne valley. Initially his meagre income came from rabbits sold to a travelling butcher, small amounts of cream from the house cow, and potatoes. In due course he ran a Limousin bull with a herd of hardy suckler cows and bred Blackface sheep.

Away from farming John was generous and sociable. He was always first to the bar, often the last to leave it. He had massive hands with palms like stottie cakes and fingers as thick as Cumberland sausages, and he liked to spread them out on a pub table and challenge other regulars to arm-wrestling bouts.

He lacked a formal education, but admired Robert Burns and taught himself the Scot's poems by reciting them as he walked behind his horses or rode on a tractor. The rhythm of farm work, he said, helped him to remember the lines.

When he reached 100, he was asked by a local television reporter for the secret of his longevity. He replied: "I've probably eaten too much, I've probably drunk too much and I've probably worked too hard. But I've been lucky – and I've survived."

John was predeceased by his wife, Christine, whom he married in 1942. He is survived by two sons, Ian and me, five grandchildren and six great-grandchildren.

• Farming

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Fighting horses, ghost caterpillar trees and the world's clearest lake are among the pick of this week's images from the natural world

A child and two women are rescued from a car stuck in fast-flowing floodwater in Worth County

EU legislation is fuelling a multibillion-dollar market. As landfill charges increase, it is often cheaper to send rubbish abroad

With the world's population and consumption increasing, the waste heap is growing. More than 4bn tonnes of waste (municipal, industrial and hazardous) is generated annually worldwide. Where does it all go?

There is a major challenge in describing and quantifying the global waste trade. A limited number of countries monitor and make public their imports and exports. Definitions and reporting discipline can vary greatly across countries. There is also a large (and growing) illegal trade in waste, which is even more difficult to monitor. The market for waste is now worth an estimated $443bn (£283bn) a year, and this figure is growing because of increasing export volumes and rising prices.

The top destination for waste is China, which in 2010 imported around 7.4m tonnes of discarded plastic, 28m tonnes of waste paper and 5.8m tonnes of steel scrap. Between 2000 and 2008, European exports of plastic waste increased by 250% – and about 87% of these exports ended up in China (including Hong Kong).

The trade is being driven by tough EU legislation forcing local authorities and businesses to recycle more, and increasing landfill charges, making it cheaper to send the waste abroad. More than a third of the waste paper and plastic collected by British local authorities, supermarkets and businesses for recycling is sent to China.

According to a report to the secretariat of the Basel Convention in 2003, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium and Germany were the highest exporters of waste, while Italy, France and, perhaps ironically, Germany, were the top waste importers.

Despite legislation banning the shipping of hazardous waste from the EU to non-OECD countries, an estimated 250,000 tonnes a year of used electrical products still flood to west Africa and Asia – hotspots are Ghana, Nigeria, India, Pakistan and China – under the guise of "used goods" or "charitable donations", allowing traders to elude these laws.

In these countries they may be dismantled by unprotected workers, often children, who remove small pieces of metal to be sold, and hard drives to extract personal information for fraudulent use. The remaining plastics and cables are often dumped or burned. More than 15 million people make money from waste-picking – almost all of them in developing countries.

Despite the difficulty in estimating the volume and value of the illegal waste trade, attempts by the UN Environment Programme and the Green Customs Initiative indicate that crime syndicates earn $20 to $30bn a year from waste crime. Inspections of 18 European seaports in 2005 found as much as 47% of waste destined for export was illegal.

According to an International Solid Waste Association report to be released in October, worldwide trade of recyclable plastics is estimated at a total of 12m tonnes a year, valued at $5bn. It flows mainly from affluent western and northern countries to Asia, especially China, which again enjoys the lion's share with about 70% of the global market. Europe is the major collective exporter with Hong Kong, the US, Japan, Germany and the UK representing the top five individual plastic scrap exporters.

• Waste
• Recycling
• China
• Africa
• European Union

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Two people found dead in a garage late Thursday as firefighters battle to a 'draw' with blaze near Colorado Springs

Two people were found dead in Colorado on Thursday as firefighters battled to a "draw" with a fast-moving fire that has become the most destructive in the state's history.

The El Paso County sheriff, Terry Maketa, said crews had found the remains of two people who appeared to be trying to flee the Black Forest residential area outside Colorado Springs.

The victims were found in a garage and apparently died in the first hours after the fire ignited on Tuesday afternoon.

"The car doors were open as if they were loading or grabbing last-minute things," Maketa said.

The fire was covering about 25 sq miles on Friday after crews were able to keep it from spreading despite swirling winds and bone-dry conditions, said Maketa.

Little more than 36 hours after it started in the Black Forest area north-east of Colorado Springs, the blaze had surpassed last June's Waldo Canyon fire as the most destructive in state history. That blaze burned 347 homes and killed two people.

Thursday began sombrely, with Maketa drawing audible gasps as he announced the number of homes lost. But by late that afternoon, a film of much-needed clouds stretched out overhead, as Maketa and other officials described determined efforts to keep the conflagration from spreading to more densely populated areas to the south and west.

In one instance, Maketa said, firefighters stood with their backs to the wall of a rural school building and successfully fought back the flames. "These guys just decided they were going to take a stand and save that building," he said.

Earlier on Thursday, residents were ordered to leave 1,000 homes in Colorado Springs – the first within the city limits. About 38,000 other people living across roughly 70 sq miles were already under orders to get out.

'Sometimes it's just nature'

Black Forest, where the blaze began, is described as the largest contiguous stretch of ponderosa pine in the US – a thick, wide carpet of vegetation rolling down from the Rampart range that thins out to the high grasslands of Colorado's eastern plains.

It offers a case study in the challenges of tamping down wildfires across the west, especially with growing populations, rising temperatures and a historic drought.

Once home to rural towns and summer cabins, Black Forest is dotted with million-dollar homes and gated communities – the result of the state's population boom over the past two decades. El Paso County saw double-digit population growth in the last decade and is now Colorado's largest county, with an economy driven by military and defence spending.

Nigel Thompson, a computer programmer who moved to a house on a 60-acre Black Forest lot in 1997, said he had cut down trees to form a firebreak and fitted fire-retardant roof tiles after taking in evacuees from a fire five years ago, but "it didn't make a damn difference at the end of the day". His home was incinerated on Tuesday.

"If you're surrounded by people who haven't done anything, it doesn't matter what you do," Thompson said. "It's interesting that you can have a house in a forest and the building code doesn't say anything about the roof design."

Homes built on windy mountain roads appeal to homebuyers seeking privacy but often hamper efforts to stamp out fire. The El Paso County commissioner, Darryl Glenn, who represents Black Forest, said the commission has tried to ensure that new developments have brush clearance and easy emergency access.

"Sometimes it's just nature," he said. "When you have a fire like this in a semi-arid environment, there's not a lot you can do."

Other fires burned in Colorado, New Mexico, Oregon and California.

In Canon City, 50 miles south-west of Black Forest, the 5 sq mile Royal Gorge fire was 20% contained on Thursday. It destroyed 20 structures, many at Royal Gorge Bridge and Park, and damaged wooden planks on a suspension bridge 955ft above the Arkansas river. An aerial tram was destroyed.

A lightning-sparked fire in Rocky Mountain national park was burning on about 300 acres, less than originally estimated.

• Colorado
• Wildfires
• United States

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Recent extreme temperatures that are commonly followed by floods can largely be attributed to climatic warming

Near-record temperatures in Pakistan have claimed hundreds of lives and devastated crops in the third major heatwave in four years. But as temperatures on Friday dipped to under 38C (100F), signalling the end of nearly four weeks of blistering heat, leading meteorologists warned that the country could expect longer, more intense and more frequent events in future.

Qamar-uz-Zaman Chaudhry, a vice-president of the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and former director of Pakistan's Met Office, said the recent extreme summer temperatures that are commonly followed by massive floods could largely be attributed to climatic warming. "If we look at the frequency and the trend of the extreme weather events impacting Pakistan then it is easy to find its link with climate change," he said.

Chaudhry, who wrote Pakistan's climate change policy, authored a report in 2013 that showed the number of heatwaves in Pakistan had increased from 1980 to 2009 and that average temperature in the Indus delta was steadily rising.

In 2010, the May temperature in Mohenjo-daro, a semi-ruined city in Sindh province, reached 53.5C (128F), the fourth highest temperature ever recorded in the world and the highest ever in Asia.

Babar Hussain, who runs the Pakistan Weather Portal, said: "In 2013 the maximum was 51C/52C. The heatwave started on 12 May in Sindh province and gripped the entire country by 15 May. It lasted, with only a minor break, until 10 June. In that time, it reached 51/52C in Larkana, [a city of 2 million people in southern Sindh province] while Lahore, Punjab province's capital of about 15 million population, recorded 47C on 23 May, its hottest temperature since 1954."

The effect of the heatwaves on human life has been devastating. Newspapers in Pakistan have reported hundreds of deaths because of the heat since early May, but no official numbers have been released.

"With the coming of the monsoon rains this year, we have already begun to see an increase in cases of diarrhoea. This is because of contaminated drinking water," said Isaac Chikwanha, medical co-ordinator for Médecins Sans Frontières in Pakistan. "Heat strokes and dehydration are common among children and adults before the monsoon season when the temperature rises."

"The rise in vector-borne diseases including diarrhoea, cholera, gastroenteritis, typhoid and hepatitis is due to environmental factors and the effects of climate change," said Iqbal Memon, president of the Pakistan Paediatric Association. "The Indus River used to flow at full strength prior to the monsoon season and freshwater was abundantly available. Now there is no water in the Indus River. Ponds and riverines in Sindh have become contaminated, but people have no other option but to use that water for drinking and cooking. This lack of freshwater is purely due to environmental reasons," Memon told Dawn newspaper.

Farming has been badly affected, with cows giving less milk and not enough water for some crops. "The heat actually helped the cotton crop because it came when it was flowering and it quickly turned into fruit," said Mustafa Talpur of Oxfam in Islamabad. "But it badly hit the sugarcane, rice and chilli crops. The lack of irrigation water has affected the yield, but the exact impact wont be known until the harvest is over."

The heatwave may have affected people in cities more than in rural areas, partly because of the "heat island effect" which sees temperatures in urban areas 5-8C higher than in the countryside. Urban conditions were particularly bad because the heatwave led to power cuts which in turn led to violent protests. Many families were unable to pump water or run air conditioners. Officials at one point turned off the air conditioning in government offices.

Pakistan is, along with Bangladesh, highly vulnerable to natural disasters, and has experienced massive floods in the last three years, droughts and heatwaves.

• Climate change
• Natural disasters and extreme weather
• Natural resources and development
• Pakistan
• Flooding
• Drought
• Meteorology

John Vidal
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

 

I’m on my yucca-framed porch swing sipping an organic Orange Julius and watching an 8,500-acre wildfire creep towards me here on the Funky Butte Ranch. Shrug. Just more climate change era chaos. I can smell and in fact feel the heat from the blaze already. Its light ash snowfall accumulating on my napping dog rather powerfully conveys the message that I’m on 41 acres surrounded by a huge ponderosa pine campfire eight miles away. My role is something like a putative marshmallow.

 

You can’t be a reader of these Dispatches and not realize that I’m at heart an optimist. Sure, my thinking goes, if general visibility decreases to below the official Forest Service benchmark level of “teacher’s lounge,” I will have to evacuate, for the sake of my human kids’ lungs (what to do with my goat kids is another question).

 

On the other hand, breakfasting to the sight of a massive smoke wall boiling over my eastern butte has a lot going for it. For one thing, how many times can one say one has so breakfasted? (It’d be my second climate change evacuation, actually, the last in Alaska 15 years ago.) Also, it vastly reassures me about having awakened today, rather than to the usual hummingbird wing alarm clock at the bedside window feeder, to an altogether more motorized aerial assault underway in my remote New Mexican valley.

 

This explanation was literally the bright side of potentially becoming a refugee; of temporarily abandoning the moment-to-moment silence I often describe as my health plan.

 

Readers of TOO HIGH TO FAIL will know why that is. It’s because the last time this many planes and choppers encircled my valley, it was to raid my AARP member neighbor for cultivating his own herbal medicine – about a dozen cannabis plants. This prior to the launch of New Mexico’s state medical cannabis program, which would today make my neighbor’s garden totally legal.

 

Forget about the hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars that went into that day’s cartel-ignoring Operation Annoy a Retiree Minding His Own Business. It was only the Drug War that brought automatic weapons (instead of the usual coyotes) to my riverbed, putting my family in danger. That, in fact, was what spurred me to write TOO HIGH TO FAIL, whose paperback release I’m now announcing. So to see federal aircraft employed for something other than Drug War assaults reinforces my feeling that we, the American people, are winning this one.

 

I’m remembering the research for the book, conducted from the front lines of North America’s longest war in 2011, with fondness. In examining a locavore approach to the post-Drug War economy in California’s famed Emerald Triangle, following small farmer efforts to brand themselves as Napa did with wine, I learned a lot about what sustainable family agriculture is. This (sustainable family agriculture) is the kind of industry you particularly tend to support when your homestead is imminently threatened by the “hundred year weather events” we seem to get on alternate Thursdays here in the Land of Enchantment these days.

 

Another way of saying this is that my final reflection on the irrefutable Drug Peace majority that has emerged nationwide and worldwide in the past year is: it will be terrific for the planet if the peace dividend from the end of the trillion dollar Drug War boondoggle includes putting independent, community-based farmers back in the field and sustainably bringing a multi-billion dollar industry aboveground. From what I’ve seen from Hawaii to North Dakota to Kentucky, America is ready.

 

I say this with confidence. I was far to the optimistic side of the punditsphere when, in TOO HIGH TO FAIL, I declared that the fall of the Drug War’s Berlin Wall was imminent. But I confess it seemed a no-brainer from the Emerald Triangle cannabis fields and strain development barns that I was studying. So as a result of stating the obvious (I mean, polls were already showing solid and growing majority support for medical cannabis in places like Kentucky, Illinois, Florida and Missouri) now I’ve become a go-to cannabis pundit because a producer can slam dunk a pitch with, “He predicted this.”

 

I’m not complaining. Forget about the heartland, the tipping point toward the Drug Peace now extends to the top of the old media hierarchy. I mean, you tell me. I would characterize the deciders at the Washington Post Company as accepting if not endorsing the inevitability of cannabis legalization by allowing me to publish this essay last Sunday entitled “Five Myths About Marijuana Legalization.” In fact, they assigned it.

 

I even got to talk about hemp in that ditty, which is what my next book, coming out later this year, is about. More on that in a future Dispatch. Same with my new syndicated Drug Peace Bumblebee column. One thing at a time.

 

And here’s the one thing at this time: I’d so love it if you’d use this note to help me launch the TOO HIGH TO FAIL paperback pre-order with flair. (Not Office Space flair. Stephen King pre-order flair.) I’d so appreciate it if you’d broadcast this missive through your social, professional and familial networks. The link to order is: http://www.amazon.com/Too-High-Fail-Cannabis-Revolution/dp/1592407617/ref=tmm_pap_title_0/192-9768244-4742452?ie=UTF8&qid=1330625413&sr=1-1

 

Specifically, I think it’ll take about 100,000 paperback pre-orders to convince my editors to issue a commemorative and forest-saving hemp edition of the book next. So you can help change policy while laughing at an in-the-field description of the Drug War’s final battles. Also there’s a fun new afterward in the paperback edition about the peace dividend we can look for when our worst policy since segregation finally ends. Seems like when a great nation makes its occasional blunder, it really goes for it. Gets it out of its system.

 

OK, thanks as always for your support. It’s so appreciated here on the possibly soon-to-combust Funky Butte Ranch. A strong launch helps me as a writer, but, more importantly, ending the Drug War will immediately have a direct impact on my life: It’ll keep automatic weapons out of the riverbed in which my children play.

 

Oh, yeah, the TOO HIGH TO FAIL paperback release live event tour is on. I’ll hit New Mexico first, then the Pacific Northwest and Arizona, then California. East Cost and Midwest dates are shaping up. Check out or book events at: http://www.dougfine.com/events/.

 

With more thanks than you can imagine, more thanks even than you might think necessary, but I believe there’s never too much appreciation,

Doug

Funky Butte Ranch, New Mexico

 

P.S. This Dispatch gives you a lot of opportunities to link to the Amazon page for TOO HIGH TO FAIL, including the e-version, and these are absolutely great, but I’d be remiss not to remind folks who live near actual bookstores (remember those?) that such are a terrific option also. And there’s Barnes and Noble and Books a Million, too.

 

Click Cover Image to Order

 

TOO HIGH TO FAIL MEDIA

 

Conan O’Brien:  http://www.dougfine.com/media-appearances/

 

New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/books/review/too-high-to-fail-by-doug-fine.html?_r=0

 

Washington Post:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/five-myths-about-legalizing-marijuana/2013/06/07/9727eac4-c871-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story.html

 

C-Span/Book TV: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/TooHi

 

Book Talk: http://www.mendocoasttv.org/CoastCurrents_23.html#featured

 

CBS News: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504367_162-57507439-504367/too-high-to-fail-cannabis-and-the-new-green-economic-revolution-by-doug-fine/?tag=socsh

 

Daily Beast:  http://www.thedailybeast.com/videos/2012/08/12/too-high-to-fail.html

 

MSNBC: http://tv.msnbc.com/2012/12/08/is-the-war-on-drugs-finally-going-to-pot/

 

Huffington Post Live:  http://live.huffingtonpost.com/r/segment/506b11f002a76025c20003e7

 

Salon: http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/marijuana_prohibition_hanging_by_a_thread/

 

BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19336816

 

ReasonTV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uI22wehAl7Y

 

Doug Fine’s DRUG PEACE BUMBLEBEE Column: Syndicated by Alternet, each week, the author of Too High to Fail pollinates the Drug Peace Message via meetings the world over with cannabis-friendly folks from all walks of life:  http://nationalcannabiscoalition.com/2013/04/the-drug-peace-bumblebee/

 

REVIEWS OF DOUG FINE’S TOO HIGH TO FAIL

 

“Fine has written a well-researched book that uses the clever tactic of making the moral case for ending marijuana prohibition by burying it inside the economic case.” -Bill Maher in The New York Times

 

“Fine examines how the American people have borne the massive economic and social expenditures of the failed Drug War, which is ‘as unconscionably wrong for America as segregation and DDT.’ A captivating, solidly documented work rendered with wit and humor.”  -Kirkus (Starred Review)

 

“A well-researched journey into the world of legal cannabis farming and a funny, maddening account of [American] farmers’ travails under federal persecution on an island of legality.” –Outside

 

“In his entertaining new book…(Fine) successfully illuminates an unusual world where cannabis growers sing ‘Happy Birthday’ to (friendly law enforcement) while crossing their fingers against the threat of federal raids. This informative book will give even hardened drug warriors pause.” -Publisher’s Weekly

 

“An important book.” -Michael Pollan

 

Click Cover Image to Order

 

 

UK cities pay to send rubbish to Norwegian incinerators, but green campaigners warn of dangers

For a country blessed with bountiful oil supplies, it may appear incongruous. But Norway is importing as much rubbish as it can get its hands on, in an effort to generate more energy by burning waste in vast incinerators.

The Eurotrash business may sound like an unpromising enterprise, but it's one that is increasingly profitable. The UK paid to send 45,000 tonnes of household waste from Bristol and Leeds to Norway between October 2012 and April this year. "Waste has become a commodity," says Pål Spillum, head of waste recovery at the Climate and Pollution Agency in Norway. "There is a big European market for this, so much so that the Norwegians are accepting rubbish from other countries to feed the incinerator."

He refuses to divulge the sums involved, saying only that the market is growing. Spillum is "considering requests" to burn waste from other UK towns. "As a rule we generate about 50% of our income from the fee we receive to take the waste and about 50% from the sale of the energy we create," he says.

Norway is not alone. Waste to energy has become a preferred method of rubbish disposal in the EU, and there are now 420 plants in Europe equipped to provide heat and electricity to more than 20 million people. Germany ranks top in terms of importing rubbish, ahead of Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands. But it's Norway that boasts the largest share of waste to energy in district heat production, according to Danish government-funded State of Green.

Oslo's waste incinerator was built with extra capacity to cater for future growth. "With more and more countries in Europe moving away from using landfill, we assume that there will be growth in waste to energy," says Christoffer Back Vestli, communications adviser for the Oslo municipality. "At the moment, the city of Oslo can take 410,000 tonnes of waste a year and we import 45,000 tonnes from the UK. Europe as a whole currently dumps 150m tonnes of waste in landfills every year, so there is clearly great potential in using waste for energy."

Spillum adds: "It is cheaper [for some UK towns] to pay for us to take their waste than to pay landfill fees."

The incinerator only takes "clean trash" and the municipality is careful to filter out anything that could be hazardous. Norwegians are meticulous about their waste and divide household rubbish into three bags – blue for plastic to be recycled, green for food waste to make biogas and white for everything else that goes to the waste plant. But many are concerned that the rubbish being imported from the UK and Ireland may not be so carefully sorted. "We have no way of knowing whether the rubbish coming in from Bristol or Leeds or Ireland has been properly sorted or is 'clean'," says Henning Reinton, head of Greenpeace in Norway.

There are worries that burning rubbish may discourage recycling. Julian Kirby, of Friends of the Earth, says: "Waste for energy isn't as green as it's made out to be. We estimate that 80% of what's in the average waste stream is easily recyclable." Kirby argues that the incineration system creates confusion: "If you think your waste being burned is a good thing then you are more inclined to just chuck things away rather than recycling them."

Some Norwegians also view the waste-to-energy plant as a blot on the landscape. "People in the city find it quite ugly," says Reinton, who is campaigning against the use of incinerators to generate energy from waste. "The modern facilities are far less polluting and damaging to the environment than the older incinerators, but burning waste is just a shortcut. We need to think about longer-term strategies for minimising it."

But most residents seem comfortable with the idea of burning waste to create fuel, with 71% of the population supporting the renewable energy source. Ove Merg, an electrical engineer in Oslo, says: "We certainly think it's positive that we use an environmentally friendly energy source. It's great that waste can be useful, and that it actually heats our house."

Øistein Thomassen, a photographer from the city, adds: "We produce insane amounts of waste every day, so why not use waste as fuel for heat? As long as the benefits outweigh the risks, I think that using waste as an energy source is brilliant."

• Waste
• Energy
• Renewable energy
• Norway
• Europe

Helen Russell
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Holstein heifer Loh Nastygirl deemed 'a super cow from head to toe' in annual bovine beauty event in Oldenburg

German cow Loh Nastygirl has been crowned the country's most beautiful bovine after charming judges in the northern city of Oldenburg this week.

Nastygirl beat around 250 other candidates from Germany, Luxembourg and Austria to win the title of "Miss Germany" presented every two years by the German Holstein Association (DHV), an umbrella group representing 14 organisations dedicated to breeding the Holstein breed of cow.

"She's a super cow from head to toe," Egbert Feddersen, the manager of the DHV, told the Guardian of Loh Nastygirl. "Nothing was missing."

All the cows were primped and preened behind the scenes to make them look their best for the show, with 12 hairdressers brushing and drying, according to a DPA report.

Feddersen said while assessing the cows, judges looked in particular at the udder – the most important feature of the bovine.

"The farmer earns his money with it, so it is important that it is particularly well-developed and that it's big enough," said Feddersen.

"The next point is the legs and hooves. The cow has to walk around on its legs every day, therefore, they have to be healthy and the joints have to be healthy. The third criterion is the body, which has to have a large frame, as we call it, because it has to be able to eat enough to produce enough milk."

Feddersen said the three criteria had to "paint a nice picture" and, just as with people, "fit together in harmony", something, he said, Loh Nastygirl achieved.

• Germany
• Europe
• Animals
• Farming

Louise Osborne
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

The Chinese Academy of Sciences translated a Heartland report, but endorses the climate change consensus

The Heartland Institute is a fossil fuel-funded think tank that gained notoriety in May 2012 for launching an ad campaign comparing those who agree that humans are causing global warming (that's 97% of climate scientists and the majority of the rest of us) to the Unabomber and Osama bin Laden.

Heartland also funds a report written by a group calling themselves the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), which tries to be the contrarian response to the IPCC. The NIPCC report itself is BS (Bad Science), repeating numerous long-debunked climate myths and cherry picking data.

However, a branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences recently decided to translate the NIPCC report. The Heartland Institute has triumphantly trumpeted this as evidence that the Chinese are becoming "skeptics" and the climate consensus is crumbling, claiming for example,

"The trend toward skepticism and away from alarmism is now unmistakable,"

"Publication of a Chinese translation of Climate Change Reconsidered by the Chinese Academy of Sciences indicates the country's leaders believe their [failure to sign a global climate treaty] is justified by science and not just economics."

However, Heartland's interpretation of these events does not jibe with the statements or actions of the translators, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, or the Chinese government. Here are relevant comments from the NIPCC translator's preface [PDF]:

"The most recent [IPCC] report ... found that most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (>90%) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, represents the consensus scientific opinions on international climate change studies. Yet, as with any academic topic, there are still differing viewpoints and debates on the causes, facts, impacts and trends in climate change."

"In order to help Chinese researchers to understand different opinions and positions in debates on climate change, at the end of 2011, we contact The Heartland Institute, the publisher of these two reports."

"The work of these translators, organizations and funders has been in the translation and the promotion of scientific dialogue, does not reflect that they agree with the views of NIPCC"

And here is the Chinese Academy of Sciences response to inquiries about the translation and Heartland's (mis)interpretation of its meaning:

"...this is only a book cooperation between the Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library and Heartland Institute, and is limited only to copy right trading, with no academic research work involved.

A few CAS experts participated in the translation of the book, aiming to demonstrate different voices in the global scientific field to the Chinese science community, however, that does not mean that we CAS joined the research or agree with their view point; neither does it mean that CAS will decide "promote" the climate "skeptic" view or group."

These are not quite the ringing endorsements of the NIPCC report or the climate contrarian position that the Heartland comments imply. In fact, the Chinese Academy of Sciences has signed onto this joint statement along with 12 other Academies of Science, in which they endorse the IPCC consensus position on human-caused global warming and note,

"Responding to climate change requires both mitigation and adaptation to achieve a transition to a low carbon society and our global sustainability objectives."

In short, the Chinese Academy of Sciences endorses the IPCC consensus position that humans are causing global warming. They recognize that there are dissenting views (from the 2–3% minority in the scientific literature), and they offered to translate the NIPCC report as an opportunity for climate contrarians to make their case. However, the translators and Chinese Academy of Sciences explicitly note that this translation does not mean they agree with the contrarian position or the contents of the NIPCC report.

In fact, China has recently been taking a leading role in addressing climate change. They're testing out a carbon cap and trade system, are trying to ensure that their coal consumption has peaked, and have reached an agreement with the USA to reduce hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions, which are potent greenhouse gases. China has also been diversifying towards more low-carbon energy sources. Does this sound like a country that denies that human greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change, as Heartland suggests?

As if Heartland's misrepresentation of China and its Academy of Sciences weren't bad enough, they also distorted the positions of the Russian and Polish Academy of Sciences, claiming the translation "follows strong statements by the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Polish Academy of Sciences dissenting from claims that global warming is either man-made or a crisis."

The claim about the Russian Academy of Sciences is based on a statement from a single scientist affiliated with the Academy. What does the Russian Academy of Science actually say about global warming? They signed the same joint statement as the Chinese Academy of Sciences, endorsing the IPCC consensus view that humans are causing global warming, and that we must "transition to a low-carbon society".

The claim about the Polish Academy of Sciences is based on a statement from the Academy's geologic science committee. Like its Chinese and Russian counterparts, the full Polish Academy of Sciences has signed statements endorsing the human-caused global warming consensus. For example in 2007 (Google English translation) and in 2010:

"It is widely agreed that human activities are changing Earth's climate beyond natural climatic fluctuations. The emission and accumulation of greenhouse gases associated with the burning of fossil fuels, along with other activities, such as land use change, are the principal causes of climate change."

So Heartland's claim about "the trend toward skepticism" (where "skepticism" actually means contrarianism) is pure fantasy. The reality is that the Chinese, Russian, and Polish Academies of Science all endorse the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.

Moreover, as our recent study found, that consensus position is growing in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. As Graham Readfearn recently documented, over the past two decades, fossil fuel interests have engaged in a number of campaigns to cast doubt on the existence of the consensus on human-caused global warming. Convincing the public that this settled science is still in dispute has long been a top priority for industry groups.

Heartland's misrepresentation of the positions of the Chinese, Russian, and Polish Academies of Science is the latest in this long line of efforts to cast doubt on the expert consensus on climate change. However, if the Bad Science in the NIPCC report represents the "differing viewpoints" the Chinese will be exposed to, I wouldn't bet on them reversing their endorsement of the human-caused global warming consensus anytime soon. Global temperatures will continue to rise, and the expert consensus on human-caused global warming will continue to grow along with them.

• Climate change
• Climate change scepticism
• Climate change
• Science and scepticism

Dana Nuccitelli
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

NSA Prism is motivated in part by fears that environmentally-linked disasters could spur anti-government activism

Top secret US National Security Agency (NSA) documents disclosed by the Guardian have shocked the world with revelations of a comprehensive US-based surveillance system with direct access to Facebook, Apple, Google, Microsoft and other tech giants. New Zealand court records suggest that data harvested by the NSA's Prism system has been fed into the Five Eyes intelligence alliance whose members also include the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

But why have Western security agencies developed such an unprecedented capacity to spy on their own domestic populations? Since the 2008 economic crash, security agencies have increasingly spied on political activists, especially environmental groups, on behalf of corporate interests. This activity is linked to the last decade of US defence planning, which has been increasingly concerned by the risk of civil unrest at home triggered by catastrophic events linked to climate change, energy shocks or economic crisis - or all three.

Just last month, unilateral changes to US military laws formally granted the Pentagon extraordinary powers to intervene in a domestic "emergency" or "civil disturbance":

"Federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the President is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances."

Other documents show that the "extraordinary emergencies" the Pentagon is worried about include a range of environmental and related disasters.

In 2006, the US National Security Strategy warned that:

"Environmental destruction, whether caused by human behavior or cataclysmic mega-disasters such as floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, or tsunamis. Problems of this scope may overwhelm the capacity of local authorities to respond, and may even overtax national militaries, requiring a larger international response."

Two years later, the Department of Defense's (DoD) Army Modernisation Strategy described the arrival of a new "era of persistent conflict" due to competition for "depleting natural resources and overseas markets" fuelling "future resource wars over water, food and energy." The report predicted a resurgence of:

"... anti-government and radical ideologies that potentially threaten government stability."

In the same year, a report by the US Army's Strategic Studies Institute warned that a series of domestic crises could provoke large-scale civil unrest. The path to "disruptive domestic shock" could include traditional threats such as deployment of WMDs, alongside "catastrophic natural and human disasters" or "pervasive public health emergencies" coinciding with "unforeseen economic collapse." Such crises could lead to "loss of functioning political and legal order" leading to "purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency...

"DoD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States. Further, DoD would be, by necessity, an essential enabling hub for the continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance."

That year, the Pentagon had begun developing a 20,000 strong troop force who would be on-hand to respond to "domestic catastrophes" and civil unrest - the programme was reportedly based on a 2005 homeland security strategy which emphasised "preparing for multiple, simultaneous mass casualty incidents."

The following year, a US Army-funded RAND Corp study called for a US force presence specifically to deal with civil unrest.

Such fears were further solidified in a detailed 2010 study by the US Joint Forces Command - designed to inform "joint concept development and experimentation throughout the Department of Defense" - setting out the US military's definitive vision for future trends and potential global threats. Climate change, the study said, would lead to increased risk of:

"... tsunamis, typhoons, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes and other natural catastrophes... Furthermore, if such a catastrophe occurs within the United States itself - particularly when the nation's economy is in a fragile state or where US military bases or key civilian infrastructure are broadly affected - the damage to US security could be considerable."

The study also warned of a possible shortfall in global oil output by 2015:

"A severe energy crunch is inevitable without a massive expansion of production and refining capacity. While it is difficult to predict precisely what economic, political, and strategic effects such a shortfall might produce, it surely would reduce the prospects for growth in both the developing and developed worlds. Such an economic slowdown would exacerbate other unresolved tensions."

That year the DoD's Quadrennial Defense Review seconded such concerns, while recognising that "climate change, energy security, and economic stability are inextricably linked."

Also in 2010, the Pentagon ran war games to explore the implications of "large scale economic breakdown" in the US impacting on food supplies and other essential services, as well as how to maintain "domestic order amid civil unrest."

Speaking about the group's conclusions at giant US defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton's conference facility in Virginia, Lt Col. Mark Elfendahl - then chief of the Joint and Army Concepts Division - highlighted homeland operations as a way to legitimise the US military budget:

"An increased focus on domestic activities might be a way of justifying whatever Army force structure the country can still afford."

Two months earlier, Elfendahl explained in a DoD roundtable that future planning was needed:

"Because technology is changing so rapidly, because there's so much uncertainty in the world, both economically and politically, and because the threats are so adaptive and networked, because they live within the populations in many cases."

The 2010 exercises were part of the US Army's annual Unified Quest programme which more recently, based on expert input from across the Pentagon, has explored the prospect that "ecological disasters and a weak economy" (as the "recovery won't take root until 2020") will fuel migration to urban areas, ramping up social tensions in the US homeland as well as within and between "resource-starved nations."

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden was a computer systems administrator for Booz Allen Hamilton, where he directly handled the NSA's IT systems, including the Prism surveillance system. According to Booz Allen's 2011 Annual Report, the corporation has overseen Unified Quest "for more than a decade" to help "military and civilian leaders envision the future."

The latest war games, the report reveals, focused on "detailed, realistic scenarios with hypothetical 'roads to crisis'", including "homeland operations" resulting from "a high-magnitude natural disaster" among other scenarios, in the context of:

"... converging global trends [which] may change the current security landscape and future operating environment... At the end of the two-day event, senior leaders were better prepared to understand new required capabilities and force design requirements to make homeland operations more effective."

It is therefore not surprising that the increasing privatisation of intelligence has coincided with the proliferation of domestic surveillance operations against political activists, particularly those linked to environmental and social justice protest groups.

Department of Homeland Security documents released in April prove a "systematic effort" by the agency "to surveil and disrupt peaceful demonstrations" linked to Occupy Wall Street, according to the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF).

Similarly, FBI documents confirmed "a strategic partnership between the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the private sector" designed to produce intelligence on behalf of "the corporate security community." A PCJF spokesperson remarked that the documents show "federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America."

In particular, domestic surveillance has systematically targeted peaceful environment activists including anti-fracking activists across the US, such as the Gas Drilling Awareness Coalition, Rising Tide North America, the People's Oil & Gas Collaborative, and Greenpeace. Similar trends are at play in the UK, where the case of undercover policeman Mark Kennedy revealed the extent of the state's involvement in monitoring the environmental direct action movement.

A University of Bath study citing the Kennedy case, and based on confidential sources, found that a whole range of corporations - such as McDonald's, Nestle and the oil major Shell, "use covert methods to gather intelligence on activist groups, counter criticism of their strategies and practices, and evade accountability."

Indeed, Kennedy's case was just the tip of the iceberg - internal police documents obtained by the Guardian in 2009 revealed that environment activists had been routinely categorised as "domestic extremists" targeting "national infrastructure" as part of a wider strategy tracking protest groups and protestors.

Superintendent Steve Pearl, then head of the National Extremism Tactical Coordination Unit (Nectu), confirmed at that time how his unit worked with thousands of companies in the private sector. Nectu, according to Pearl, was set up by the Home Office because it was "getting really pressured by big business - pharmaceuticals in particular, and the banks." He added that environmental protestors were being brought "more on the radar." The programme continues today, despite police acknowledgements that environmentalists have not been involved in "violent acts."

The Pentagon knows that environmental, economic and other crises could provoke widespread public anger toward government and corporations in coming years. The revelations on the NSA's global surveillance programmes are just the latest indication that as business as usual creates instability at home and abroad, and as disillusionment with the status quo escalates, Western publics are being increasingly viewed as potential enemies that must be policed by the state.

Dr Nafeez Ahmed is executive director of the Institute for Policy Research & Development and author of A User's Guide to the Crisis of Civilisation: And How to Save It among other books. Follow him on Twitter @nafeezahmed

• Climate change
• Activism
• NSA
• Prism
• Energy

Nafeez Ahmed
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Pollution, poor diet and stress are causing health problems in world's most populous country despite health reforms and affordable healthcare

China is now facing similar health issues to higher income countries including the UK and US, according to new global health figures.

Poor diet and cancer are a growing concern in China compared to issues such as TB and measles just 20 years ago.

Since 1990, rapid improvements in health have led to fewer infectious diseases. Children under five are also much more likely to survive. In a snapshot taken in 1990, there were 1m child deaths, compared to 2010, where the number was down to 213,000. People are also living longer – from a life expectancy of 69.3 years in 1990 to 75.7 today.

But health problems from smoking and high blood pressure are increasingly a problem. Just over half of Chinese men smoke – one of the highest rates in the world. Chinese women are at the opposite end of the scale, with one of the lowest smoking rates, but the number of people exposed to passive smoking in China could be as high as 72%, according to figures published in The Lancet journal.

Stroke, cancer and poor diet

Stroke is now China's biggest killer, causing 1.7m deaths in 2010. Diseases such as diabetes and cancer are also up. Chinese women are a lot less likely to die from breast cancer – only South Korea and Saudi Arabia have a higher rate of survival – but five cancers, including lung, liver and stomach, are among the top 15 killers.

The changing health trend comes from figures compiled for the 'Global burden of diseases, injuries and risk factors', a collaborative study led by researchers at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) at Washington University.

The study compares China to other countries in the G20, a group of 20 of the world's major economies. Previous health figures released by the IHME showed the UK was lagging behind most other European countries when it came to deaths from preventable causes, such as smoking, unhealthy eating, alcohol and drugs.

While people in the UK are healthier and living longer, Britons suffer more from disabling conditions such as back and neck pain and depression.

The likelihood of dying early in China is now only slightly higher than the US. Comparisons between China and the G20 countries can be made using data visualisation tools, including the top 25 causes of people dying early.

"China has made significant improvements in health over the past 20 years," IMHE's Dr Haidong Wang said.

"Stroke is the leading cause of death and has increased by 35% since 1990. Blood pressure is second after dietary risks." Along with smoking, Wang said consuming high amounts of salt with not enough fruit and whole grains – even in rural areas – is a problem.

Women have fared better – mortality rates of women up to the age of 34 have dropped by a half.

"Communicable disease is down, too," Wang said. "So there is a lot of good news. But non-communicable diseases are increasing, especially cancer."

Changes to healthcare

While some change has been incremental – the study says the rise in non-infectious diseases and chronic disability has also been driven by urbanisation, rising incomes and ageing – the Chinese government is making healthcare changes that could also have an impact.

"In 2009, the government announced major health reforms," Wang said. "The public was unhappy about healthcare being unaffordable and the fact that people had unequal access to healthcare based on status and where they lived. In the next decade, the government plans to train a significant number of family physicians."

Twenty years ago, China had a health profile very similar to much of the developing world, including countries such as Vietnam or Iraq.

"The main thing other countries can learn from China is that rapid change to improve health is possible within a relatively short period of time, especially in reducing communicable disease," says Wang. "The transformation of health in China has happened in just 20 years."

More than 680 million people in China now live in cities – now more than half of the country's population – driven by the search for jobs and economic opportunity. But air pollution and other issues can lead to health problems.

"Urbanisation leads to lifestyle change such as reduced physical activities, added living and working pressure and unhealthy dietary change, all of which contribute to higher risks of having NCDs," says Dr Winnie Wang from the School of Geographical Sciences at Bristol University.

"More than 200m temporary migrants in cities have more limited access to health services. Increased pollution level in cities due to vehicles and industrial development have also put the urban population at a higher health risk than those in a rural population."

"China not only has the largest ageing population but also one of the fastest growing in the world. Ageing is considered as a driving force for NCDs as elderly people can be more vulnerable."

Dr Gonghuan Yang, professor at Peking Union Medical College and a joint lead author of the IMHE study, said "aggressive tobacco control measures" would need to be a part of any important public health strategy. Tackling the issue, Yang has said, would take significant political will and public engagement to counter strong opposition to tobacco control in China.

This piece was originally published on The Conversation website

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To get more articles like this direct to your inbox, sign up free to become a member of the Global Development Professionals Networkx

• Global health
• China
• Health
• Health & wellbeing
• Diets and dieting
• Pollution

guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Photographs from the Guardian Eyewitness series

The company will pay £40m for a 25% stake in a shale gas field in Lancashire, giving the driller a presumed value of £160m

Speculation over the worth of the UK's shale gas industry has veered between the enormous – enough to fuel the entire country for decades to come according to estimates from the British Geological Survey – and the negligible: several big gas players, including BP, Shell and Centrica, have said the amount of shale gas likely to come from the UK was nowhere near enough to trouble investors.

That speculation has been turned on its head. Centrica has taken a 25% in Cuadrilla, the only company to have started shale gas fracking in the UK. But the amount the company has paid for its stake tells us more about the likely worth of the UK's shale gas industry than any of the wild pronouncements yet.

Centrica will pay £40m for a 25% stake in Cuadrilla's main shale gas field in Bowland, Lancashire, giving the shale gas driller a presumed value of £160m. There is also the small matter of £60m that Centrica will contribute to Cuadrilla's drilling to come.

Cuadrilla has already sunk more than £100m into drilling for shale gas in the UK, most of it in Lancashire's Bowland shale, with not a penny yet to show in gas production, and with many setbacks – it has been forced to cease drilling in Lancashire after two small earth tremors at one site and fears for wildlife at another. The company is also looking to drill in Sussex, where its preliminary drillers recently started work in Balcombe, but it faces strong local opposition.

The amount Centrica is prepared to pay reveals the appetite – or lack of it – for investors in the UK's putative shale gas fields. Lord Browne of Madingley, former chief executive of BP, and now chairman of Cuadrilla and a director of its venture capital backers, Riverstone Capital Partners, told the Guardian earlier in 2013 that he would ensure the company and its backers invested "whatever it takes" to make shale gas in this country a viable industry. It seems that Riverstone did not have enough enthusiasm, or capital, to do that alone.

Valuing Cuadrilla – which is the only company yet to have fracked in the UK, and the owner of the licences to frack most likely to bear early fruit – at only £160m in nominal terms is a severe blow for those who think the UK's energy future is homegrown gas. That low valuation should cause serious worry on the right wing of the Tory party, many of whom have been advocating a "dash for gas" as a cure for the UK's energy woes.

But fracking is no easy solution. As the International Energy Agency warned this week, the UK is not like the US, where extensive fracking in the last five years has sent the price of gas plummeting. Population density is much higher here, and the geology is much less propitious. Shale gas fracking involves blasting dense rocks apart under immense pressure, using water and chemicals, and regulations in the UK are much tighter than they are in the US.

Gas is not a low-carbon fuel, whatever its proponents may claim. It is a fossil fuel, and greenhouse gas emissions from fracking are higher than from conventional gas. If it is not carried out properly - ensuring no methane leaks out - they can even be higher than the emissions from burning coal.

Thursday's leap by Centrica into the shale gas market reveals what few in the fracking fraternity have been willing to admit – that the value of the UK's fracked gas market is low, and that the probability of the UK becoming a global centre for shale gas production is slight. The government should not be pinning its hopes on shale gas for the UK's homegrown energy future.

• Shale gas and fracking
• Energy
• Fossil fuels
• Gas
• Centrica
• Utilities

Fiona Harvey
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Meteorologists are debating our role in bizarre weather events. We have the technology for change, but not the political will

On Monday, Amory Lovins, physicist, environmentalist, and unassuming colossus of the green movement, appeared in London to talk about energy use. I mention this in the context of the Guardian's story that meteorologists are due to meet next week to discuss whether our bizarre weather is climate change-related (moreover, anthropogenic climate change-related) or just represents natural variation.

I have got into the habit of mentally and often literally shutting my eyes when I see a story like that; ditto, when I see the phrase "400 parts per million". What else do you do about a looming disaster that politics refuses to address? How is it possible to stay hopeful, when the G8 is meeting and climate change isn't even on its agenda? What's the point of international politics if not to address this?

But then I heard Lovins talk about his negawatt revolution, and it cheered me right up.

He said the solutions are already there; we know how to make cars out of materials that make them so much lighter they could be powered on hugely reduced fuel. We know how to build houses with solar bricks so that they don't need heating (he grows bananas in his house, while it's snowing outside and without heating it. This blew my mind). We also already know how to make renewable energy work: Austria gets a quarter of its inland energy consumption from renewables; Sweden a third; Latvia more than a third.

What we lack is not expertise, but will. We're living with politicians so feeble that they see wind energy as a local planning issue and they're afraid to talk about saving energy for fear that it might sound expensive. Faced with a scientific consensus on carbon use that is as close as humanity will ever get to unanimous, their response is to find more carbon.

The discoveries we need to make are not technological; they are human. How do we imbue the political cycle with some long-term thinking, some altruism, some care for future generations?

What this situation needs is actual bad weather, actual negative events, that we can all see, that we can agree on the significance of, to spur us into action. In the meantime the answers are sitting there, waiting to happen.

• Green politics
• Climate change
• Climate change

Zoe Williams
guardian.co.uk © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Reuters photographer David Gray spent time documenting life in the central Pacific island nation of Kiribati, a chain of 33 atolls and islands that stand just metres above sea level

Mee-Lai Stone